Digging up old designs of mine is a yearly trend. Recycling baseboards and concepts is normal things as much of us have a few pet subjects we like to gravitate toward. In my case, it’s well known I’ve always been a big fan of rural branchline terminals and 1900s-1920s railways (before and right after nationalization). Connors was cool, but it’s a long stretch of straight tracks, however, another design of mine was inspired by Boston & Maine’s Stanstead station, a small terminal built in 1896 to connect Stanstead, QC to the Massawippi Valley Railway (MVR) that was, at that time, operated by B&M.
This is even more appealing that I've been looking for a neat small design to build a layout for my living room. Something that is both a conversation piece, a playground, a display shelf and an invitation to operate when a friend visit.
Stanstead layout as designed many years ago and never built.
To make a
long story short, Stanstead was supposed to be a major rail hub in the
mid-1850s, but several political and corporate shenanigans left it out of the
game with several railways passing by but none ever serving it. At some point
in the 1870s, the MVR built a small industrial spur from Beebe Junction to
nearby Rock Island, a small town about 1 mile from Stanstead. However, the
larger town was still left alone in its corner, devoid of any direct service.
Fortunately, B&M would rectify that 26 years later by providing 3 trains in
each direction each day to connect with corresponding trains on the mainline at
Beebe Junction according to a June 22th, 1903 public timetable.
Stanstead Branch 1903 timetable (published in Stanstead Journal) |
Postcards
and pictures of the era show that trains were short. About one combine and a
coach, this was more than sufficient. Stanstead was a small location, with only
a standard B&M depot, a runaround track, a team track with a freight shed,
an enclosed water tank and a small turntable. Not that it needed anything else.
I have no idea about the freight traffic that ran over the spur line, but it
was probably the usual suspects such as dry goods, lumber, farm equipment,
grain and coal. To that should be added granite, which is a specialty of the
area. Also, starting in 1896, B&M ran a milk car in conjunction with
Canadian Pacific that ran from Stanstead to Lennoxville to Montreal.
A typical passenger train (credit: Matthew D. Cosgro)
As a matter
of fact, Stanstead, as I imagine it, is nothing more than the perfect design
element you can dream of. It’s the epitome of a rural station without any
gimmick. It’s bare bone railroading at its best. For this reason, while it’s
based on a prototype, it has universal appeal and I wouldn’t make it absolutely
a B&M layout, but rather a generic one that can be used for various railway
companies, depending on my mood.
I could easily imagine a converted IHC 2-6-0 as a starting point |
The
template being relatively small and the layout self-contained, I had to do some
calculations to make sure everything would fit like a puzzle. The basic unit
was a train composed of a small steam locomotive (4-4-0, 2-6-0 or 4-6-0)
pulling three 40ft freight cars and one combine. It should be possible for the
operator to do all the switching moves without using a cassette or any other
means. The winning formula was to have a 3-car long track at the end of the
line and a 3-car + 1 locomotive long switching lead at the other end. The
runaround would be long enough to accommodate 3 cars and a wooden combine.
A mockup to determine the perfect track length
While the
plan was easy to determine, making it attractive required something else. Chris
Mears often confess his love of sweeping curved tracks on layouts. I agree with
him, they are aesthetically interesting and also provide excellent vantage
point to railfan a train. With the recent passing of Iain Rice, I looked at a
few of his beautiful layout drawings and decided I would add that British touch
to the layout by twisting the tracks. Add some topography and it should make it
an attractive sight!
A small revision to jazz things up a bit
As for rolling
stock and motive power, I already have several small steamers to kitbash and an
extensive collection of old time equipment. The nice thing is that many cars in
the 1900s-1910s were still very short, including 30-32ft reefers and boxcars,
short flatcars and small gondolas. That means that while the layout was
designed with 40ft cars in mind, it will look even better with the old rolling
stock.
If you add a curve to the front edge, and a proscenium arch of course, you'll get the full Rice effect.
ReplyDeleteHi René! Thanks for the suggestion! I'm not sure I'll build a proscenium since I want to keep it simple, but a nice curve on the front edge would create a neat foreground space to frame pictures better and make the team track scene more compelling. I'll try also to play with topography so the layout isn't a drab flat plank but a real railway infrastructure built upon an irregular land.
DeleteHello,
ReplyDeleteAnother great layout project !
I'm a fan of your different projects, and I really appreciate the description of the intellectual journey that you describe. Maybe it's because I'm also an architect !
I particularly appreciated your project on the Tring Subdivision line. I enjoyed it so much that I even considered making it. What happened to this project, did you completely abandon it?
I never built anything relating to Tring because I never built the garage that would have housed it. Several concepts have been recycled in Monk, but it certains doesn't offer the same gammut of opportunities. I think Monk would make a neat club layout. I wish more people in Quebec had a real interest in modelling local prototypes in a meaningful way.
Delete