For those interested and that may attend, just to let you that I'll pay a visit to the Railroad Hobby Show in West Spingfield, MA this weekend.
Feel free to talk to me if you recognize me which may be quite unlikely!
For those interested and that may attend, just to let you that I'll pay a visit to the Railroad Hobby Show in West Spingfield, MA this weekend.
Feel free to talk to me if you recognize me which may be quite unlikely!
It seems changing job means less time to post on Hedley Junction. I wish my posting could be on par with my modelling frenzy to be honest! But putting that aside, today I share more oldies: Accurail shells with custom decals. As a matter of fact, I'd like to give a shout out to William Brillinger who did a terrific job at printing the decals. Don't consider it an ad, but just a token of appreciation for the honest advices he gave me and the quality product he provided.
As for Intercolonial, they placed many orders between 1912 and 1914 for a total of almost 6000 cars. Being built years before the CGR ones, they rode on archbar trucks. I used Tahoe trucks which I consider a little bit pricey, but excellent in quality, very crisp, free rolling and worth every penny. They differed from the Accurail cars because they had a 5 feet door instead of a 6 feet one. Westerfield resin kits provide a more prototypical starting point for those interested in greater accuracy.
In the future, I wish to replicate a 1917 Canadian Northern Fowler car and several CPR prototypes and variants. At that point, I will have modelled almost every pre-1918 variations in Canada. If some people are aware of other Canadian railways owning Fowler cars before 1918, let me know! I've never seen a Grand Trunk Pacific Fowler car picture and would like to replicate one.
In the « Most Pretentious Railway Name In Canada » category, the Great Northern Railway of Canada is a serious nominee. The French version of the name was even worse, giving birth to a contrived translation that was so long it covered almost an entire side of the car. On the other hand, it must be acknowledged that at that time, only a handful of railways painted their French corporate name on their rolling stock. To my knowledge, only “Chemin de fer de Colonisation de Montfort”, “Chemin de fer Québec Montréal Ottawa & Occidental” and Chemin de fer de la Baie des Ha! Ha! did so. Most lines in Quebec City area generally went by with an English name even if a good chunk of the board and customers spoke French (which to be honest, was a serious rarity). It was, in a sense, more fashionable. In France, railways generally kept their name very short and poetic instead (Paris-Orléans, Chemin de fer du Nord or Paris-Lyon-Méditerranée).
Having a good locomotive on a project is generally the face of the layout. It's the ambassador, the motivator and the enabler all wrapped in one. A personal link is created between us and the overall world we try to create. Probably because the locomotive is generally where the human element plays a crucial role on the railway stage.
For this reason, I wanted to capture the essence of a classic Grand Trunk locomotive in the early 1910s. While Grand Trunk did use a lot of engine type, it must be acknowledge they had a humongous fleet of 4-4-0s crisscrossing the country from the 1850s up to the 1920s when many of these locomotives found a new life under Canadian National. Look online or in book, if you find a GTR pictures, odds it's a 4-4-0 are extremely high...
Cows and engines are mutual friends, as long as there's a fence! |
Interestingly enough, GTR 4-4-0s weren't generic but rather peculiar in appearance because Grand Trunk maintained huge locomotive shops in Pointe-Saint-Charles near Montréal. Several thousands people worked there, repairing, maintaining but also building entire locomotives from parts or scratch. Even the engines acquired for other manufacturers were poised to get rebuilt with typical GTR features such as slatted pilots, typical headlights and ubiquitous torpedo shaped steam domes. While paint schemes varied a lot in the early days, by the 1890s, GTR settled upon an austere black scheme with white lining. Some would say GTR was getting extremely cheap, which was true, but it was also the trend elsewhere in North America where ornate locomotives were getting slicker as the mid-1800s fad died out. I would try to capture that early 20th century vibe as much as I could.
To recreate such an engine, I started with a Bachmann Modern 4-4-0, which is probably one of the great RTR small steamer on the market. Bachmann was smart enough to provide a lot of customization opportunities to recreate various locomotives. All domes can be swapped for three different styles. The same apply to the stack, cab (wooden and two different steel ones) and pilots. This is, to my mind, a great way to get the most you can out of a tooling and a chassis. Also, the boiler and cabs are die cast, giving enough weight for the locomotive to perform adequatly.
Modifications were done on cab windows that were too small and the wrong shape. Hours of careful filing was required, but it was well worth my time. Modern domes were modified using Magic Sculpt putty and some custom 3D printed valve bonnet. Running boards were altered and the tender letterboards completely redone with new tool boxes.
A crew is life... |
Painting was straightforward and I used a lightly faded black paint. I could have gone with grimy black, but I have no idea what type of weathering I'll apply and GTR locomotives back then were quite clean and shiny. Decals were provided by Black Cat Publishing who made our lives easier since the old CDS Lettering dry transfers are getting hard to source and not always reliable to apply.
Once the locomotive was completed, it felt drab and soulless, which was a disappointment. It needed some figures to add life. Finding Edwardian locomotive drivers isn't exactly easy. A few figure makers in UK propose such products, but the people depicted are a little bit too British in their clothing. After looking at several pictures of GTR locomotive crews, I found out most people wore a flat cap and about half the guys worked without overall. Looking into my spare part box, I found two old 1950s Revell HO figures that could fit the bill. Their pose was wrong, but by cutting and moving their limbs around, they could be worthy engineer and fireman. Painting was straightforward, but I took care of never using bright colors. As is becoming common recently in my modelling approach, I prefer to use faded colors right from the start. Light colored shirts become tan or buff, heavy wool pants are a dirty grey and jeans overalls are a grimy bluish gray. Nothing must stand out.
With the crew onboard, the locomotive is now alive and ready to run on the layout. I like how the engineer raise is hand, as if his communicating with the crew or waving at someone. As for the fireman, he's small and focused on his task. He reminds me a railway friend of mine, Charles-Étienne, so I guess the figure is now unofficially named after him.
It still need to complete a lot of things on the module, but so far, one of the biggest hurdle is cleared and I'll be able to focus on new challenges!
2022 was probably, in hindsight, my most productive year ever as a modeller and I’m not saying it lightly. Listing everything here would be a fool’s errand, but just from the top of my head, it includes completing more than 16 linear feet of scenery on the club layout, including the entire paper mill, replicating a few real houses, experimenting with various carving and weathering technique, customizing over 3 dozens 40ft boxcars, designing a Grand Trunk caboose kit, overseeing the final steps that led to the release of two Canadian National woodchip cars, building the backbone of my future Monk Subdivision layout (including wiring), compiling modelling notes about British-American tank cars, writing a book chapter on weathering and finally, going all out about early Canadian railways modelling. On top of that, starting the adventure of launching a cottage industry of custom parts and kits, which I have no idea where it will lead. My only regrets is not having had enough time to write up a few articles I’ve been asked for by a major publication… something I’d like to do in 2023.
The year
has also been full of 3D printing adventures. I was, to be honest, about to
simply drop the towel and leave that technology to others, but has I mentioned
to Trevor Marshall this week, I’ve finally reached the point where 3D printing
is no longer that frustrating one-fits-all solution, but a convenient tool in
the toolbox. It’s not the beginning and end of everything, but something that
has its place for some stuff. I’ve also learned the hard way the limitation of
the machine and resin, which made me confident in developing new products such
as the CNR steam conversion mini-kits or, more recently, the old time Canadian
freight cars that can be designed in less than 6-8 hours and printed in about
2-3 hours at max. I’ve even been able to print an entire station in one shot,
which was a huge confidence boost.
Later in
the year, when I knew I had to wait to continue working on Monk Subdivision, I
thought about finally building an old design of mine based on a small Quebec
railway terminal using a minimal footprint. This is, in some way, the spiritual
successor of Connors. Over the last few years, I’ve developed a keen interest
in pre-CNR railways in Canada. This theme is generally not covered by the hobby
press or even social media which, to be honest, is somewhat surprising. When we
think old time in North America, it’s the narrow gauge lines or other fanciful endeavor.
The late Craig Bisgeier’s Housatonic Railroad used to do a good job a tackling the
subject in a honest way. As for Bernard Kempinski, his work on the U.S. Military
Railroad in O scale can be considered top notch museum quality with the caveat
of being so well-researched and executed with such talent that it can be
intimidating. Also, let’s not fool ourselves, the American Civil War is
basically a non-event for Canadians and I’m not sure it is a good vehicle to
promote 19th century railroading here in Canada. We know about it,
but it doesn’t resonate with our identity and history. However, I tip my hat to
Bernard for tackling such a terrible subject with such tact, taste, elegance and
talent. Another one to add to this list would be John Ott’s imaginary
Miskatonic Railroad, which replicate the heydays of 19th century
railroading in the Northeast, but even his work with intricate paint schemes of
the Victorian era can be intimidating to any mid-level modeller.
That said,
in Canada, the subject is almost taboo as if anything before 1918 was
irrelevant for the modeller. Nobody talks about it… except Rene Gourley who,
for some reason, has decided to heroically soldier in Proto:87 to replicate the
Canadian Atlantic Railway in HO scale. Rene’s endeavor is so frightening and
imposing that even him regularly write about how this subject can be crushing!
That’s plain madness, the kind of gorgeous madness that provides inspiration and
doubt at the same time! Yes, it is!
Strangely
enough, Canada was one of the earliest adopter of railways. One of the earliest
project was devised in 1830 to provide Quebec City with a winter port on Maine’s
coast when commercial railways were in their infancy. During all the 19th
century, the talk in town was about trains. Countless colorful companies were
created in the same fashion that happened in the United States. However, since
most funds and many engineers came from the United Kindgom, our railways had a
distinct British flavor that gave it a touch of originality. Americanized
Birkenhead locomotives being probably the most eloquent example, or the
practice of lining cabs and tenders during the Grand Trunk era. The country was
crisscrossed by small rural branchlines, regional carriers and
transcontinentals. All built under a fever dream that couldn’t be stopped. We
may, nowadays, often forget that most of our key rail infrastructure was
designed and built in the mid and late 19th century.
So, for the
last few months of the year, I’ve been pondering why nobody was modelling that
great era full of hundreds of layout ideas. And the answer I got from online
discussions and private chats shook my beliefs. Pre-nationalization railways
weren’t forgotten at all. People of all ages still research them… even when
they are interested in the post-1918 world, they will often refer to that era
in a way or another. In fact, many do model the era… Lettering a GTR locomotive
here or building an old Juneco wooden kit there. It seems the hunt for old CDS
Lettering dry transfers is also a popular habits among modellers. Yet, nothing
of that surface in social media.
It would be
easy to blame manufacturers, but they can’t start to provide models when the
market simply seems to not be there. Just take a look at Rapido’s Icons of
Steam series. The pre-orders dried out the moment it was time to produce mundane
small steam locomotives that everybody complain the hobby is lacking.
Certainly, many reasons didn’t help to boost sales such as questionable quality
control or perceived prices, but it should have been an instant hit. In
contrast, Accurail has been releasing Canadian cars in its 36ft boxcar series,
including the Fowler car. If you look at their website, all Canadian cars are
sold out and some, including Grand Trunk, are in their second release and
already sold out. In a recent discussion with an American how commission custom
orders of Accurail cars in pre-1918 paint scheme, he admitted that all is run sell
almost instantly. For him, ordering a 48-cars custom run of old time Canadian
car is a no-brainer. The biggest challenge is picking up the next paint scheme.
Some have
argued the biggest problem of old Canadian model railroading is sourcing
decals. Black Cat Publishing has done a good service to us by providing a few
Grand Trunk sets, but it’s a far cry from CDS catalogue that offered everything
under the sun. Someone will have to step in and fill the void… This is
something I’m trying to do because I think there is a place for early Canadian
railways modelling and currently redrawing and improving a lot of artwork using
the historic photos once used by CDS.
Custom decals save the day... maybe there is a market.
As for my
own personal journey, I’ve learned firsthand that working with small 32ft-36ft
freight cars, 4-4-0s and wooden passenger cars can save a lot of space when
designing a layout. Think about it, a 32ft boxcar in O scale is about the same
size than a modern 60ft hi-cube boxcar in HO scale. You can complain about the
lack of available models, but keep in mind old cars were simply wooden boxes.
If you can put together a box with tongue-and-groove styrene, most of the
battle is won. Kitbashing current models is also possible and several cars can
be sourced from Accurail, Bowser and Roundhouse if you don’t want to venture
into the costly and complicated resin world.
Stepping
down from my soap box, I can also look forward with the new skills learned when
working on the old time Standstead module. This new knowledge will be applied
to the Charlevoix railway which, I hope, will continue to progress. At the time
of writing this, the Clermont scene is about 90% completed. It’s only a matter
of a few months before we can think about taking professional photos of the
layout and seriously think about publishing something about it.
I wish you
a fulfilling 2023 modelling year. Don’t fear and dare to build your model in unusual
ways to develop your own approach. Don’t fear to go artistic and overdo things,
because later, you will be able to calibrate your effort on the next project.
Take care!